Peer Review Process

James: Journal Of Management Science is subject to COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. For details, please access the Publication Ethics section.

Every article that is submitted to the James: Journal Of Management Science will go through a series of review processes. The process used is double-blind peer-reviewed. This process ensures that the author and reviewer both do not know each other's identities. This is done to maintain objectivity in the ongoing review process.

• The review process is carried out after the article goes through the initial editing process.
• In the review process, reviewers are encouraged to pay attention to originality, objectivity, methodology, scientific impact, conclusions, and references in the article.
• This underlies the editor to carry out the next process, accepting the article, revision, or rejection of the article.

Article manuscripts will be rejected if:

• It is not matched with the journal scope.
• It does not follow author guidelines and is not willing to make adjustments.
• More than 20% of plagiarism is indicated.
• It contains topics or discussions that promote cigarettes or cigarette companies.